This article shows that professors often give English majors terrible advice about how to find a career with their English degree. The article offers a much more productive solution, helping English majors to invest their energy and ambition into their own skills and future.
Between 2005 and 2009, over 100,000 PhD’s were produced in the USA. Over that same period, only 16,000 tenure positions were created.
Before those 94,000 souls either worked as adjuncts or decided to leave academia, their Directors bestowed this infinite wisdom bit of career advice on them, a bright lamp to assist them down the path of finding a career as ten-year English majors.
Graduate study in English imparts students with a host of skills that are transferrable to a variety of positions and fields. Employers value your ability to think critically, research, problem-solve, and tolerate ambiguity.
This vague, middle-class infested thinking might have got you a job at Sterling Cooper in the 1960‘s, but the time has come to tear it down from graduate school websites.
It is an arrogant myth that anything you do up there in the ivory tower, is valued by employers down here in the lower order world of commerce and industry.
I’m going to show you why you should stop telling yourself this big graduate school lie, and suggest a much more productive solution to finding a career as an English major.
Careers for English majors? Not without a skill.
October. I remember sitting in the courtyard of the English department with a friend, a very smart modernist scholar. We were drinking coffee, making literary jokes, and talking about how much smarter we were than everyone else in the English department. A plane flew across the open square of sky above the courtyard, and we stopped for a minute while the noise passed.
“My friend is a pilot,” he said, “That’s a real skill.”
It amazed us. That ability to know all about aircrafts, landing gear, to circle massive airports like Houston or Los Angeles, pulling up thrust, calculating drag, velocity, turning theory into practice 700 feet above the ground.
“I can only take a poem,” he continued, “and not even explain it—I can only make it even harder to understand.”
Real skills. The world opened its wallets to those with concrete abilities.
And then us English majors without any real career direction. Failed analysts. Incomprehensible critics. Politically obscure and lost humanities majors, wondering if our sudden fascination with William Blake at age 17 should have turned into a 12 year intellectual odyssey, drifting further and further into abstraction.
Maybe the genius thing was just a phase. Youthful hubris. Were our parents more baffled than proud of our accomplishments? (He has won a post-doc? I don’t know what it is, some type of more school—yes, he already has a PhD, but this is sort of a PhD after the PhD which helps him get the job more than just if he had the PhD. . . No it’s still not technically a job, but he will be doing the full-duties of professor, teaching classes and research, but he still isn’t technically a professor).
But we stayed. We walked the campus pathways. We carried our armfuls of books from the archives to the Graduate Department Reading Room, a club-house of career delinquents, failed artists, egotistical young quasi-genises, and schizophrenic mature adults thinking that a PhD in art history at age 49 would help their career.
We laughed about Lacan’s diagrams. We laughed about our skilllessness. Our abstraction. Our job as literary critics in an industry of aestheticism which didn’t really exist.
We sat at the feet of distinguished scholars, pretending to really be interested in spending a Saturday tracing Bonaventura’s debt back to Plotinus, perhaps even extending this trek to a Sunday romp in Philo. We believed in literature. We believed there was a place for us here.
And one day, the cord was cut.
Your English degree is worthless
That’s what your professor doesn’t tell you.
Even a PhD. It’s an aptitude test.
Yes, grad school is lovely and wonderful (I did sign up for it all), but it doesn’t give you a skill you can sell to an employer.
The problem is semantics. Academics love to imagine abstraction as a skill. They think “critical thinking” is a skill.
What is my job? I encourage my students to foster critical thinking, a skill that will serve them through-out their careers. I’m involved in citizen-training, passing on the democratic ethos, the collective knowledge of the polis.
That garbage (and your student loans) pays their bills—not yours.
Professors survive in a work place funded by grants and people paying to learn. They sell abstraction.The world of industry uses abstraction, but under a practical direction.
But in academia, ‘the concrete’ is the production of original research. Critical thinking is essential to find holes in existing knowledge and to produce more knowledge.
Often in the nonacademic workforce, this level of thinking is simply not necessary, and rarely profitable.
If you work in a PR firm, for example, your boss will be less interested in you spending your time exploding all existing journalism theory into a radical new interpretation of human communication than she will be in having that God-damn press release about refrigeration appliances on her desk by lunch.
How to really sell yourself to employers
A better strategy is to think about the perspective of an employer. What does the employer really care about?
Your “transferable” skills, your advanced understanding of problem solving that allows you to solve a variety of different problems in a myriad of different ways.
Is this what the employer, with his overhead, rent, thousands of dollars of payroll every week, his big client yelling into his ear on Sunday night, wants to hear?
I’m not saying that writing a dissertation doesn’t take a feat of intelligence. But all that matters is perception.
Just because you have turned a box of random journal entires from Post-Colonial Africa into a coherent article about the suppression of racial genocide within the epistemology of travel narratives doesn’t mean that you can wander into the office on Monday morning, read a couple paragraphs of business philosophy, and turn a crate of market research into a successful advertising campaign.
You might be able to. But you’d have to try first. And that is a huge risk for an employer.
You need to think seriously about what you can offer employers. Physical stuff. Real results. Not inspirational garbage.
You need to be able to actually solve their problems, increase their sales, improve their product.
Can you do that?
Don’t be educated. Be indispensable.
To find a job with your PhD, or really even any degree, you have to be what Seth Godwin calls a “linchpin,” an essential small part of an organization that holds everything together. Rather than a cog in a vast machine, trying to keep their head until 5:00 PM.
If you always see yourself as self-employed, even when you work for a huge corporation, and then sell employers the product of your services, you will weather any economic storm, and survive after companies topple.
That’s because you will focus on delivering a product, a product that you can adapt to fix the changing demand in the market, rather than investing in the static fixture of a company, an education system, or even economic philosophy.
Employ yourself. Invest in your own skills. If you don’t have any skills, then start getting some. Staggering advice, isn’t it? But you can learn a lot in a year. It doesn’t take much time to become an expert in topics outside of academia, especially since most of your competition have not been in disciplined environments like grad school.
Invest in a skill, at night, in the mornings, on the ride to work. Invest. And then a return will come.
Sell yourself, your drive, your work ethic. Rather than touting some obscure degree nobody knows or cares about. Show your employer what you can do, not what skills you theoretically have been given by academia.
Sell yourself. Be an island of indispensable success.
Related Reading:
“Doctoral Degrees: The Disposable PhD. Why Doing a PhD is Often a Waste of Time.”
“How to Quit Your Job and Make the First Step to a New Career with Your MA or PhD.”
“Careers with an English Degree: How Reading Books Can Paralyze You After Grad School.”
“A Terrible Time for New PhD’s.”







[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Miguel Guhlin, marigolds. marigolds said: Sigh RT @selloutsoul Do You Make This Mistake When Selling Your English Degree to Employers? http://bit.ly/hmCNvZ [...]
Glad to see you back, James. I’ve missed your insight. You’re spot-on that English majors need real, transferable skills for the marketplace. What got me my current job was my communication undergrad major and my experience with part-time jobs and internships. They didn’t even mention my master’s in English in the interview. I tell all English majors (really, all majors in general) to get some outside experience to complement their academic studies. It helps you see if this is what the field is like and give you an edge when you actually get out there.
Hi Laura,
Thanks-a bit of writer’s block last month (I guess that’s what I get for bragging that I never get writer’s block). I agree (of course) with you. After graduating, I always kicked myself for turning down the professional writing CO-OP program at my school. They offered me a place 3 times–and every time I thought my time would be better spent prepping for grad school. Hah.
Thanks for the comment,
James from Selloutyoursoul
@James- I identify big time with your last comment. I wrote press releases for a local newspaper (for free) when I was 18 but didn’t bother keeping in touch with my supervisor, who died a year later. After that, I nearly did the “Writing Sequence” in undergrad, due to my feeling that I’d be best served by focusing on practical writing skills and lots of short-term assignments, but was seduced by the “Honors Program” (ie simulated, lax, undersupervised grad school).
Your reference to Sterling Cooper was actually pretty powerful and spot-on. It’s a useful reminder that the reason all these promises of transferable skills exist is because they were actually once true, in another era. It’s a fact that many people don’t touch, because it reminds us of how many things are out of our hands. (In my country, anyway, 90% of people will never admit that ANYTHING, ever, is out of their control- the good things happened because we did everything right and the bad things because we did everything wrong.)
Hi Ben,
“Because they were actually true in another era”–I think that really is the big point. The university simply moves slower than the world which can change dramatically in just 5 or 10 years (as we saw from 2001 to 2010).
Thanks for reading.
James from Sellout
A few years out, and comfortably employed with full benefits and a middle-class salary (I’m in business writing and publications), let me offer a little hope: my humanities PhD is not QUITE as worthless as all that.
I like to think of it as the distinction between the skills that get you your first job, and the skills that get you your fourth, fifth, or sixth job (or promotion). You’re exactly right: your PhD is wholly and completely worthless in getting you your first job. It’s probably even a liability.
Frankly, a lot of the Phd-to-business writers I’ve met have got in the door only by temping. I didn’t go this route, but it makes a lot of sense: it’s a whole lot quicker than doing gazillions of informational interviews and submitting gazillions of resumes to HR people bemused by your credentials. The recruiters at temp firms are more used to people with odd resumes and better at seeing the diamond in the rough. Plus, it’s much less of a risk if you fall flat on your face–they’re much more willing to take the chance on you.
BUT, that said, all these folks who successfully navigated a temp-to-hire (I have spoken with six, all at financial services firms) rose VERY quickly once they established their usefulness. Here’s the thing: financial services (or search engine marketing, or accounting) is a very complicated industry, and native intelligence gets you remarkably far. If you can actually understand what the quants and tech people are saying when they are describing a new service that the firm is offering, and describe it so that someone can understand it–you’re gold.
One woman, at Fidelity, became so valued that as soon as she breathed an intention of looking for another job, her supervisor offered her a promotion that jumped her two levels. That list of skills from the grad school website: that tolerance of ambiguity, that ability to problem-solve (to teach herself something she didn’t understand), that willingness to take on a project she had never been explicitly trained to do (because it was brand new–no one had been trained in it)–this was actually valuable. The old-school copywriters in the office were stuck in their ruts and refused to change–someone who could and would was actually quite rare.
True, this was three years after she joined the company as a temp, and long after she had earned her respect by copy-editing and formatting stuff for the web.
My experience wasn’t quite so dramatic, but it was similar. The out-of-academia transition was a whole lot easier when I started seeing the transition in terms of years rather than the acquisition of a single transformative job. Baby steps.
Caitlin,
I really appreciate your comment, especially the emphasis on “baby steps.” The biggest mistake I did trying to find a job after grad school was to try to leverage my advanced degree into an advanced job. I assumed that my extra school would get me around the entry level positions. I think that you are right that “thinking critically” can help you. But my argument is that people who pursue a PhD naturally have these abilities (and the desire to develop them into an application). So I think advanced education takes too much credit. Tons of people without PhD’s are able to think critically. In other words, at the present time I don’t really see the value of a PhD, at least not as it is marketed to new students. Most enter with the idea they are going to be employed as scholars or researchers.
But I do agree with you and really want to thank you for showing some light at the end of it all. I think anyone looking for a job with a PhD would be wise to take your advice to start as a temp, building their skills with baby steps.
Would you like to do an interview on my site? You could stay anonymous, if you like. Give me an email at Selloutyoursoul6@gmail.com, if interested.
James from Selloutyoursoul
Hi Jen,
Yes, math is a terrible time for me, embarrassingly so. “The world rewards you for being very good at DOING something (not knowing it).” I think this is right. When someone pays you to show up for work, you need to provide impact and value for them. The PhD is usually overkill as many people can think critically without spending years and years working on an abstract dissertation topic.
–James from Selloutyoursoul
I like your advice for English students and I think that your last line of your post totally sums up the scenario post PhD or post MA for everyone who has a degree that’s in the humanities…let alone in English.
I read it and thought: yes, yes, yes! It is totally true in my experience.
Baby steps are really important and fortunately I knew this when I graduated with my PhD. Sadly, I think that the biggest mistake many of my colleagues and those who are graduating now is to try to leverage their advanced degree into an advanced job.
I think that its important to perhaps do something somewhat mindless (perhaps a temporary job) where one has the time to think hard as to the manner in which to redeploy those skills that were learned at grad school. Yes, we all have to earn cash but one really needs time post graduating with a PhD to think critically and tactically how to achieve one’s goals.
@James: We are in total and complete agreement about the *value* of a PhD. I can say (without bitterness, but with certainty) that there is nothing I would like better than to have those 9 years of PhD/fellowships/VAPs back. I never loved it, and it makes me sad to think that I now work in a context in which, no matter how well I do and high I go, I will always be in a support role. For an ambitious person, that’s a bitter pill.
I would advise 99 out of 100 students to skip the PhD and go explore a big scary world where there’s no prescribed path to follow.
All I’m saying is that there is a strong likelihood that you will be able to get to a point, several years down the line, at which your advanced humanities degree has some financial value to you. Not nearly as much as you sank into it, in terms of earnings foregone over the years, but something. My friend in search engine marketing pointed out that an MA in linguistics was totally weird and cockeyed all by itself on a resume, but with two years of experience in search engine marketing gave him a certain gravitas that he has been able to leverage.
“wondering if our sudden fascination with William Blake at age 17 should have turned into a 12 year intellectual odyssey, drifting further and further into abstraction”.
Oh god, this is me, all over. Blog entries like this frighten me because post-MA, the only jobs I could get were entry-level secretarial work where the challenge of the day was to make cups of tea for staff members and visitory. Now in the first year of my phd in the obscurity that is Sylvia Plath.. I can’t help but worry I am just on a three-year vacation from admin work and upon completion of my thesis, will be back in the same kind of job all over again!
I remember when I was in the latter stages of my PhD when I began to realize that my chances of landing a faculty job were pretty bleak. I mentioned to my advisor that I was interested in exploring other lines of work, particularly in government. He gave me a funny look and said that I could do that if I wanted, but it would impair my chances at ever landing a faculty position because it would be seen as going to the “dark side.” He made it sound like anything but academic work was a cop-out, and that landing such a job would be a cake walk. I left academe after graduating and now know that he couldn’t have been more wrong.
Academics come out of university with completely unrealistic expectations and bad habits that make it very hard for those seeking to make the transitions to non-academic work. Employers don’t care about “critical skills and analysis” and putting that on your resume is meaningless. You’re right, it says nothing other than “I can play the academic game.” And no-one but other academics care about that game. I am now in a position where I make hiring decisions, and we get a lot of academic applicants. Although I know that many of them would likely be able to do the job, their applications are so poorly crafted that they end up begin ranked very low. The most highly educated people rarely get to the interview stage. It’s as though they believe that merely putting a degree on a resume is a free pass to a job offer.
You nailed it – applied skills and demonstrated ability is what matters in the real world and these things are not valued in university. It’s really too bad because the skills learned in university can come in useful in many other ways.
Hi AWOL,
“merely putting a degree on a resume is a free pass to a job offer.” It is embarrassing, but an accurate description of most grad student’s job search strategy. Glad that you’ve done well with your post PhD life and career. If you’d ever want to do an interview about how PhD’s can improve their applications, give me an email at selloutyoursoul6@gmail.com (it could be done with or without your name on it, if you like).
And thanks for the comment. It’s helpful to get a perspective of someone on the hiring side.
James from Selloutyoursoul
[...] then, I’ve come to see my past mistakes in trying to sell my graduate degree to employers. I’ve tried to sell the prestige of the degree, rather than the stupid work ethic that made me [...]
[...] “Do You Make This Mistake When Selling Your English Degree To Employers?” [...]
[...] “Do You Make This Mistake When Selling Your English Degree To Employers?” [...]
After reading this blog, I already fall in love with your style of writing!
Finding A Career…
[...]Careers English Majors: Do You Make This Mistake When Selling Your English Degree to Employers? | Selloutyoursoul.com[...]…
Teaching Credential Online…
[...]Careers English Majors: Do You Make This Mistake When Selling Your English Degree to Employers? | Selloutyoursoul.com[...]…
Awesome! This article is amazing, it really brightens my day! xoxo
Nice notice for all the English Majors. Appreciate it.
Gilmar…
[...]Careers English Majors: Do You Make This Mistake When Selling Your English Degree to Employers? | Selloutyoursoul.com[...]…
Klussen gezocht…
[...]Careers English Majors: Do You Make This Mistake When Selling Your English Degree to Employers? | Selloutyoursoul.com[...]…
master degree online…
[...]Careers English Majors: Do You Make This Mistake When Selling Your English Degree to Employers? | Selloutyoursoul.com[...]…
[...] “Do You Make This Mistake When Selling Your English Degree To Employers?” [...]
[...] Careers for English Majors: Do you make this mistake? [...]
[...] ~ Selloutyoursoul.com [...]
I think AWOL is right about the statement “Employers don’t care about “critical skills and analysis” and putting that on your resume is meaningless.” As long you’ve got the right training for the job, you’ll definitely land on that job you applied for. It’s not really about how smart you are but its about how can do the job.
I am a junior English Lit Studies major, minoring in Sociology. I know I want to go to grad school. I am a slightly older (early 30′s) non-trad student, and I’ve spent a good 15 years working in retail and administration. Back in academia, I am happier than I have ever been. I’m a natural teacher and I can see nothing more rewarding and satisfying than working in higher education in any field related to English studies. I enjoy literary theory and criticism, and also creative writing. I have professors that are extremely encouraging of my continued graduate studies and professors that are so negative toward the field in general that I wonder why are we encouraging students to major in a field with so little chance for a future career.
This thread paints an extremely bleak picture of employment in academia, but doesn’t really offer alternative possible paths. I need to be making some very important decisions over the next few months, and I’m just becoming more confused comparing the advice I want to hear vs. the advice that scares the beejeezes out of me.
What is your advice to this undergrad who really wants to love her job, and who thinks of money as secondary to contentment?
Are my chances of full-time employment in higher education really so slim that I would be sabotaging myself to a life of a poverty-stricken, academic gypsy?
What other avenues or graduate programs would you suggest for one such myself?`
Hi Undergraduate,
This blog is one perspective. The voices and comments it attracts have had similar experiences. There are lots of blogs out there, echoing the difficult job market.
In general, I think that the negative picture of employment in academia shouldn’t be ignored in your decision. While experiences may vary, we can at least agree that the supply of PhD’s outweighs the demand. In general, graduate studies should be carefully considered as it delays your entry into the work force and unless there is a very strong market demand, it might be an expense of passion, rather than an entry path into a career.
I have written an article detailing some options for humanities majors, both grad students and undergrads. You can read it here: http://www.selloutyoursoul.com/2011/12/19/jobs-for-english-majors/
But you love teaching–and you shouldn’t orphan that passion. All I am saying is that grad school is a decision that many people have found that the debt, the loss of opportunity by not entering the work force earlier, and abstract skills was not a very good investment.
That said, it works out for some. My only real point is to recognize that it is a risk, not a straight path into a career. If you are fine with the element of risk and feel that the benefits of success would outweigh the risks, then that is fine. But to ignore the risks is to bury your head in the sand.
I know it’s a tough decision. Seriously, I hope that it all works out for the best for you and that you find a satisfying career, inside academia or out. Here’s a few non academic choices: http://www.selloutyoursoul.com/2011/12/19/jobs-for-english-majors/