Finding a career with an English degree takes time. This article shows how to speed up the process. It also shows you how reading book after book is delaying you from finding success and a job with your english degree.
It’s November. I’m at the bus-stop, waiting for the evening bus out of town. My grandmother has died. And I’m going home.
As I sit here, I begin to think about my life few years ago. I was an undergraduate and was heading home on the bus for Christmas.
It’s a long trip and I sat there with a big bag of books, determined to read the entire trip. The bus passed through small towns, and I remember how far my future seemed ahead, so many years to go before my Ph.D. would be done, and many papers, grants, odd jobs, books, and years that I would have to wait through before I got there.
I was determined to do it. I could wait it out.
I saw this ability to delay getting a job, to delay working and instead study for ten years, as my greatest asset. All of this waiting, one day, would make me successful.
A few years later, sitting at the same bus-stop for a very different kind of trip back to my hometown, I feel very detached from that patient person I used to be.
That’s because I discovered the secret to moving beyond the paralysis of finding careers with an English degree. It’s simple. You read too much. And do too little.
Waiting. To find a job as an English major.
“Don’t impress me with your degree. Impress me with your knowledge.” Yu-kai Chou, Founder of RewardMe and Viralogy
You’ve worked your whole life for your degree. You’ve waited for this moment. You’ve been trained to wait, to delay gratification, especially if you are a grad student.
Grad students are excellent at waiting. They delay having a family till their thirties. They wait for months to hear back about a publication in a journal. They think about writing some fiction, and then decide to wait till they understand more about how literary theory works before trying their first novel.
They take a year off, work hard, and then wait to see what Ph.D. program accepts them. They wait to buy a house, wait to have a dog, and pull their partners around the country, chasing scholarships, jobs, and programs. Then they wait for ten years to find out if they are one of the “the lucky ones” who get jobs.
Life never really begins for them. It is always in a stage of transition, almost ready to become real.
That’s because they don’t want a good job. They want a great job. They don’t want to be smart. They want to be brilliant (which is the acceptable replacement for their first dream of being a genius). They refuse failure. They are willing to crawl towards a Ph.D., live in poverty, sacrifice family—anything other than being like everyone else.
And it is this slow, methodical quality that can really harm you as you try to find a career with your English degree.
After I received my M.A., I waited for my career arrived. People congratulated me—you have an advanced degree, what wonderful things must lie in your future—they couldn’t believe that I had to work as a landscaper to pay my rent. They couldn’t believe I really didn’t have employable skills.
Like me, they assumed that because of my degree things would appear.
On resumes, I would basically just tell employers about my degrees, my awards, and let the rest happen. They would know that I was valuable.
Nobody called.
It’s not a tower. It’s an ivory wall.
Arrogant me. I thought that employers automatically cared about my M.A. I thought that my graduate degree in the humanities automatically qualified me for a job. My degree was impressive. I was impressive.
But to get a job with an English degree outside of academe, you have to demonstrate value. That is, show your employer that you can earn them money with your skills, instead of regaling them with tales from of your former academic glory.
In other words, get over yourself and learn how to do something.
This was disappointing to me. I assumed that I had been in graduate school learning a skill-set that would get me a job. But when you graduate, you have to start over again.
Here’s the first step. . .
Take action. Don’t just learn stuff.
Instead of writing that novel or brilliant piece of advertising copy, are you reading book after book, telling yourself that all this learning will pay off someday?
Are you tricking yourself to think that you should learn a subject first before ever attempting it? How could I do that job? I don’t have the degree?
I have a business idea. But what does a scholar know about business? Maybe I should enroll in a prestigious MBA program?
I like to write. Maybe I could work at a magazine. If only I had chosen to go to journalism school. Maybe I should go back and do a journalism major?
Don’t go to journalism school. Write a good journalistic piece. Publish it online. Don’t go to business school. Read a few books, find a market, find a product, and make it happen.
Stop reading. Do something.
Don’t wait for a degree to give you permission to succeed.
Brian Clark was a lawyer. He quit that and started a blog about online marketing called Copyblogger.com. It was a good decision. He made millions. He didn’t go to advertising school, go back and get an MBA, or read every book on marketing before starting his company. He thought of something to do and then figured it out.
Another case study. Last week, I ran into someone from my old home town. She did a degree in Woman’s Studies, which is about the lowest branch on the “employable degree” tree. She is now a marketing manager at an advertising agency. She didn’t go back to school and get an MBA. She trained herself, worked her way up, and then figured it out.
The point is grad students have become so accustom to learning, waiting, planing. They see things in 5 year chunks. They believe in delayed gratification. They think life is like a classroom, if they only show up, scribble hard in their little notebook, and study, study, study, the teacher will notice them and reward them. These years of waiting, they will pay-off. From lowly grad student to Assistant Professor of English Literature, Harvard.
They want to be the best. But there are plenty of successes you can have on the way to being the best.
Don’t wait for a degree or total mastery of a subject to give you permission to try something out.
How to develop new skills fast: follow the 25/25/50 rule.
If you are sick of waiting, here’s a good rule to help you develop new skills in less time.
It comes from Bob Bly, a copywriter who has written over 70 books and made millions off his writing.
He says that we tend to take in too much information at once. That’s because it is easy to delay action by keeping busy. But just reading book after book leads to an overload. As Bob Bly says, “You take no action—other than to order yet another course or report to read.”
In order to make sure that you take real action, divide your time like this:
- Spend 25% of your time researching and studying the subject (marketing 101, how to be an editor, reading blogs about new skills).
- Spend 25% of the time observing. Read great writers, watch for examples of the principles you are reading about.
- Then spend 50% of your time actually doing it. It doesn’t matter if you aren’t an expert yet, just get started. Write a bad novel. Write another less bad novel. Write an article for the paper. Volunteer at a magazine.
At first, it will be hard to spend 50% of your time doing. Reading about “how to become an internet marketer” is relaxing. Editing code, fixing bugs in your website, trying to find profitable niches, and losing money at Google Ad Words—these start to feel like work.
In fact, you will feel like you are stumbling in the dark when you could be consulting the book of an expert. Wouldn’t it be faster to read about how to do it, rather than trying to figure it out myself?
But the 25/25/50 rule works. I follow it every day. I force myself to do something, rather than just learn. Americans watch thousands of hours of TV every year, but 99% couldn’t even tell you the 3 basic plot-points writers use to craft screenplays. That’s because it is much easier to watch then do.
The next time you have an hour to work observe habits. I bet you would much rather reach for the textbook than pick up the pen.
Your education of your resume is just fine. If you want to find a job outside of academe with your B.A., M.A., or Ph.D. then you need some practical experience. This means less learning, more doing.
Perfection delays action.
Academe loves perfection. Six years to write a book is normal. Ten years is better. But the real world doesn’t need perfection. It is very tolerant of mistakes.
What simple action could you do today to get you closer to where you want to be?
Take an hour. And do it.
* * * * *
Give me 126 Days. And I’ll show you how to break down big goal of finding a career into smaller, manageable daily actions.

This e-book begins right where you are—broke, no idea of what you want to do, working a crappy job, and nothing more than a degree on your resume. It is written specifically for humanities majors (BAs, MAs, and PhDs).
Each week in the e-book contains:
1. A task—something practical that is working towards a larger goal.
2. A lesson and goal—practical mistakes to avoid, milestones to hit, and higher-level stuff to help you confidently turn your humanities degree into a career.
This is the guidebook for lost humanities majors. It is designed to accelerate your humanities career transition with a rock-solid strategy and step-by-step tactics.
Learn more






Sadly, I think that it’s not clear when we all sign up for grad school that what we’re really doing is learning a specific group of skills and the manner in which they are deployed in a specific discipline. Yes, we learn lots of content but the key thing is, if one leaves ivory tower, is how to redeploy them for the commercial world.
I agree….I remember my editing class teaching us how to collate old manuscripts but it would have been more helpful to learn maybe the basics of current editing. Something to put on the resume as most of us won’t work as scholars.
James @ selloutyoursoul.com
First of all, thank you for your perspective, it has been interesting and thought provoking. However, as a graduate student in history, I feel that I must defend grad school–it might be a crazy choice, but that doesn’t mean it’s a terrible one!
You describe grad school as purgatory, a waiting game, “putting off life.” But I see it very differently, I see it as potentially the most rewarding 6-8 years of my life! I love reading,thinking, writing, and having an excuse to do only that. Let’s me honest, is working in an insurance company or a bank going to be anymore meaningful? If I write a book a love and that makes even just a handful of people think about something in a new way, then I’ll feel like I did something important.
I don’t see giving up a family in the near future or not having a stable job as too much of a sacrifice. Who cares cares if I wait until I’m 30 to have kids if I’m enjoying myself as a grad student! People live a long time now, 30 is not that old. While my peers are barely making ends meet in a terrible economy as baby-sitters and bar-tenders, I get a decent pay check teaching. Perhaps I won’t have a lot of choice in where I work, but at least I’ll be doing something that gives me incredible pleasure. So yes, if you only see grad school as a means to an ends, a “prestigious” way to get money, then for God’s sake don’t go! But if you see it as a great ride, even if it isn’t an easy one, or may lead to fewer job options, than go for it! I, for one, have never been happier.
Hi Grace,
I too enjoyed my time at grad school. But part of that enjoyment, for me, was the idea that I was both doing something I liked and building a career. It is nice to study and I always will enjoy learning.
Thanks for reading–james @selloutyoursoul.com
“Who cares cares if I wait until I’m 30 to have kids”?
Your ovaries do.
“People live a long time now”
But the body still starts to fall apart in the 40s and — no matter what TV advertising says — your 50s just aren’t as energetic as your 20s.
“I love reading,thinking, writing, and having an excuse to do only that.”
That’s great, if your family is “99%”. Otherwise, it’s mental masturbation and a complete waste of effort.
Get a real job that uses your BA in English to good use and save the reading for evenings and weekends.
“Perhaps I won’t have a lot of choice in where I work”
You say that now, but won’t when you realize that you *hate* the the place you are forced to work.
“I’ll be doing something that gives me incredible pleasure”
I like reading just as much as the next geek, but it’s a *hobby*, not the focus of my life.
Thanks, that was very encouraging. The blog kind of depressed me. It’s all really just a matter of perspective.
to the poster above: you must be in your first or second year of grad school. wait till you are ABD, in your 30s for the past 3-5 years trying to work on your obscure diss. topic that nobody really cares or will ever really read; you’ll find out that there’s more to life than just reading/ research/ writing. those jobs you mentioned arent exciting, yes, but face it, they are going to be much much happier in their 50s (assuming they enroll in their IRAs/pensions) have already paid for a mortgage etc and are just riding life easily while students like yourself will not have a savings worth over 10,000 assuming you aren’t being spoiled by mommy and daddy. take it as it is: when you are much older – you will develop a different perspective in life — much much harsher than what yous ee now — im also guessing you are relatively young .. mid 20s i assume.
Thanks Jenlinc,
I can remember getting up in the morning and really being happy and excited about the day, especially the days that I would spend writing papers. But part of the purpose of my blog is to celebrate “selling out” and the enjoyment and intellectual challenges you can find in “the real world.” So while I very much enjoyed my time at grad school, I am just as happy now and find that I also enjoy writing non-academic things. But I agree with you–it is very fun to spend some time in a library rather than an office. I probably should write a post on the positive things which grad school has given me. Always grateful for your thoughtful comments.
James @ selloutyoursoul.com
To anonymous poster: Yes, I’m 22. This is my first year of grad school, but I should be done before my mid-30s, the plan is 29. But regardless, I think I’d rather have enjoyed my career than have a stock pile of money in my 50s. Heck, I live in a studio apartment, I have no car… or even a TV for that matter. So I’m more than willing to sacrifice an expensive lifestyle for passion (though I really don’t see it as much of a sacrifice). Also, it’s not like most profs are on the poverty line, $40,000-$60,000 is livable. And people seem to forget that grad school and working as a professor is about more than writing obscure dissertations, it’s also about teaching college students–which is important and rewarding.
And James, I really do enjoy this blog, and I think it gives both grad students and ex-grad students important things to think about. However, I still think that it’s possible to make a career out of the humanities, as hard as it’s becoming. I would definitely be interested in hearing what you consider the positives of grad school.
“I think I’d rather have enjoyed my career than have a stock pile of money in my 50s”
I thought the same too when I was 22.
Then I realized that this country isn’t a socialist utopia, and that I’m actually responsible for my own life.
By the time you get into your 40s, being married and having kids, house, back yard, minivan, etc *are* as pleasant as “tradition” has cracked them up to be, and going out with other singles is as lonely as it’s cracked up to be.
I’m currently a higher education administrator at an American university and find a lot of value in this blog. More than anything else, it provides a crucial perspective that those considering Ph.ds seem to ignore. While I long ago decided that pursuing a Ph.d was not worth it (BA, English + advanced degree in another discipline), your story validates that choice I made in my early 20s. It’s my wish that your blog enables smart kids to bravely follow your example and steer clear of Ph.d programs altogether, unless they’re fully aware of what lies ahead.
Hi John,
Thanks for the encouraging words–I’m glad your path worked out and I also hope that my blog sheds some light on the risk involved with a Ph.D.
James @selloutyoursoul
To Grace: I’m a former English graduate student who spent three years in a PhD program and felt almost exactly like you do now while I was there. I left after three years with nothing to show for it, and wished someone had been honest with me about the impact graduate school would have on my future. Since you are open minded enough to pursue this blog, I highly recommend you read “Just Don’t Go,” recommended on this blog, and found here:
http://chronicle.com/article/Graduate-School-in-the/44846
Wish I’d read it in my first year, or earlier. See what you think.
@ Grace – confirmed – not trying to be a wise elder here, just trying to point out reality. Yes, being a college professor IS a rewarding, meaningful career you can be passionate about. But please listen to the facts – your chances of becoming a professor are slim and getting slimmer. Your chances of being an adjunct – with more of those “rewarding” college students than you can keep up with, without substantial health benefits, and with little hope for advancement, even with a PhD – are growing.
I you can live the life, do it. But it’s the kind of choice you have to make fully informed and with clear eyes, and what worries me and the other experienced PhDs here is that the things you are saying are the things that we said when we started – that is, before we were disappointed and forced to start our lives over.
Thank you Jacob and Gabe. I will take a look at that article.
I think profs are becoming increasingly honest about the job market; the “lies” about graduate school are declining. It was one of my former undergrad professors (who, ironically, also wrote one of my recommendation letters) who directed me to this website. My current adviser is equally market conscious, and she is helping me steer my grad school career into being as marketable as possible considering the challenges I will likely face. I’m also an Irish immigrant, and I’m hoping my E.U. passport will allow me opportunities abroad. Depending on what the next few years hold, I might consider stopping at a masters. However, I’m not ready to give up my dream quite yet. I’ve met many recent Phds who have landed great jobs and don’t regret their choice at all.
Your essay reminds me of how hard I found it to be in my first post-grad year to assign a lesser role to the intellectual pursuits that had animated my undergrad career. This is just a hunch, but for those among who discovered, perhaps a little bit later in our college careers, just how much joy can arise from really hard thinking on topics that fascinated us, may have found it really difficult to disengage from academe, even if academe is purported to have negative, sometimes severe, effects on our longer term development and wellbeing–financial, spiritual, or otherwise. It’s like discovering and relinquishing some new found power in a single turn.
At any rate, as an undergrad, I studied history at a prestigious research university and fell in love with thinking about and doing history. However, even as a lowly undergraduate, my social network included grad students; so, I didn’t have a particularly romantic vision of grad students or grad education in the humanities. Many of the folks I knew got real joy from their studies, but I also sought ought and read critical pieces on academe. I came to regard many of the grad students I knew as people who had given up a lot to be given a space to continue to think and write about things that mattered a lot to them. I also knew how hard many of them worked to stay afloat financially and how that sometimes diminished the amount of time that they actually had to do the thinking and writing which had attracted them to grad school in the first place.
Toward the end of my undergrad days, my senior thesis advisor encouraged me to consider grad school, but when I told my advisor I found the prospect of grad school to be unattractive, he seemed more relieved than disappointed. I wonder if more undergrad kids spent time around grad students, not just their TAs, would they develop more complex, nuanced views on graduate education? If there was less social distance between many of the undergrads and grads, would a more accurate understanding of the real benefits and costs emerge?
At this point, I’m not really all that young any more, but as a 22-year old, I did pay attention to the advice of some “elder” grad students and honest professors.
To them, I am grateful.
Hi Jack,
It’s true…you see things different when you spend some time with grad students. I can remember my first conference and thinking that some of the mid-aged adults must be professors–but they were all still writing their dissertations, still working towards that first job. I thought to myself: How long does it actually take? I feel lucky too, and like I dodged a bullet.
Thanks for the great comment.
James @selloutyoursoul.com
I’m glad I found this blog. Thank you, James! I have my B.A. in Art History, which I loved; and I thought I would go straight into my M.A. and PhD and teach in a University. But I’m grateful that when we (somewhat unexpectedly) started our family before I graduated for my undergrad, it postponed any thoughts of pursuing my M.A. and PhD. While I love art history and I have started using my skills to teach in homeschooling co-ops, I’m grateful I can have both worlds. I love being a mom and an academe. Being a mom just comes first.
Hi Morgan,
Thanks for finding it. Sounds like you carved out a nice little niche with your BA and I’m glad you didn’t have to postpone family until after the long grad school train. Glad it worked out for you and thanks for commenting.
James @selloutyoursoul.com
[...] to Mulvey, one thing that hurts graduate students is that they are used to waiting for for everything. Grad students are excellent at waiting. They delay having a family till their thirties. They [...]
I felt almost guilty as I read through this article, and subsequently all of the comments, because it came at the tail end of a 4 hour google session researching grad schools.
The entire post sounds so much like me. I really do need to put down the books, blogs and tutorials and pick up the pens, hammers, and paintbrushes.
I’ve always been a person who wants, not just to be brilliant, but everything else in between. At 24, after 4 college transfers (and several majors), a B.A. in English, and roughly 6 months into a job search that hasn’t yielded one interview, I continue to be sorely disappointed that I cannot fulfill childhood dreams of being a doctor, and a professional artist, an author, a professor simultaneously. The list just goes on and on.
And now for a multitude of different reasons, I find myself 90% set on going back for a M.A. of some sort. Yet a lot of people are shaking there head, telling me its a bad idea.
I love learning and everything that comes with it. If I had the cash and the time, I would probably enroll tomorrow at the most prestigious university I could find just for the sake of it. That said, I also want to go back because I want to correct a few things I feel I missed out on during my rushed, multi-state undergrad experience. I want to work a worthwhile college job for longer than 6th months. I want to edit and write for a school newspaper. I want to build my network. I want to apply for internships and not be turned away because they are “for academic credit only.”
I know I won’t “increase” my salary with an advanced liberal arts degree, but is there some chance I can secure ANY salary with one?
I’m struggling so hard to determine where the benefits outweigh the costs?
Hi Sarah,
I feel your confusion and understand the disappointment. I think I have said my views in the post–but would encourage other readers to maybe give some advice. I don’t think doing a MA would make you less employable–it just won’t give you any experience. Any job you can get with a MA you can get with a BA. The same goes for Ph.D. (minus tenure or college teaching).
In other words, I don’t think more education will answer any of the problems you outline in your comment. You can apply for internships at magazines (you don’t have to write for the school paper) or can write for online magazines. I don’t want to lecture, but I think you need to figure out what makes you happy and what you are willing to sacrifice. Then you need to make a compromise between practical considerations (finding a job) and your ideals. The result might not be a perfect career, but it might mean more freedom and security to do what you love to do.
Feel free to email me at selloutyoursoul6@gmail.com
James @ selloutyoursoul.com
This post was very evocative and provocative.
It’s interesting how the same behavior was interpreted by different people as “delaying gratification” and by others as going for “instant gratification.” In the end, I come down on the side that it’s actually instant gratification to stay in school, even though it does involve a lot of waiting. The real world involves much more delay. In the real world, people work shitty jobs that don’t match up with their identities and you start doing things they don’t know how to do with nobody to monitor their progress. Compared to an academic program with guaranteed feedback, the real world feels extremely delayed.
The post-degree (especially if it’s a post BA as it was in my case) world is at first a lot more thrilling than the academic world, even if it is a bit depressing at the same time. I worked and loved the fact that I didn’t have homework but I did have money. I traveled with some of that money. I moved to a bigger city and stayed wherever I could. I took care of myself more than I ever had before. It was scary and great.
But after a year of that, I really appreciated the value of an education. When your education-experience balance is heavily tipped to the side of education, you tend to value experience more (I think that’s why so many academics tend to idolize the Beats and their ilk). Since so many of us – not only humanities students and former humanities students, but also many people who get “prestigious” jobs after graduation – are more tilted to the side of Too Much Education, we talk about experience like it’s the greatest thing in the world. But as someone who feels he has pretty much balanced out his over-education with experience, I can say that education should not be undervalued. Sometimes, if you want to be a journalist, and you really don’t know where to start, sure, you should start a blog, but grad school is not a bad idea. The structured environment, the contacts, and the ability to get the aforementioned “internships for credit” are very valuable to a student with a purpose.
Another interesting way to look at it is by the 25-25-50 rule… One of the 25s and the 50 can be done with or without school, that’s for sure. But the first 25 – which, we can’t forget, is necessary even if it is the easiest one- is often accomplished more effectively within the structured environment of school. I also want to add that, even though most of us disagree with this trend, an MA does often look better than “5 years in retail with interesting internships and projects on the side” to most employers, so grad school also applies to the 50, although to a lesser extent. If I were hiring paralegals, for instance, I’d probably hire a bookkeeper at a restaurant over someone with an MA any day, but that’s not how most of them operate. So I think a good question is, How does school fit in with my 25-25-50? Because it most likely does. It’s just tragic that MANY academic programs cater to and enable those whose lifestyles are heavily weighted toward the first 25.
Like you, I’m in B.C. with an M.A. and disillusioned about my life long dream of obtaining a career in academia. I’m glad to have found this blog as I navigate my way around coffee shops and temp agencies. “Don’t wait for a degree to give you permission to succeed” is an excellent motto, and I’ll probably reiterate that point the next time someone tells me to “get a practical college post-grad diploma”
[...] “Careers with an English Degree: How Reading Books Can Paralyze You After Grad School.” [...]
[...] “How Reading Books Can Paralyze You After Grad School.” [...]
[...] “How Reading Books Can Paralyze You After Grad School.“ [...]
[...] Careers With An English Degree: How Reading Books Can Paralyze You After Grad School [...]
steroizi…
[...]Finding careers with an English degree: Stop Reading Books! | Selloutyoursoul.com[...]…
[...] “How Reading Books Can Paralyze You After Grad School.“ [...]
I am so thankful that I stumbled across this article while looking, of course, for ideas about what to do with my BA in English and M.Ed.- other than teach high school. I have spent the past couple of years agonizing over how, exactly, I am going to continue my education in a PhD program and everything that it takes just to be accepted to a program with full funding, given that I am a wife and a mother and need to pay a lot of bills. After reading this article, I just felt this sense of deep relief that I might not actually be a failure if further academe isn’t right for my family at this time, though it might someday be. It occurs to me that I have an hour before I need to pick my daughter up from daycare- I’m going to write for a while. Again- thanks for your perspective, and know that this little article might have been a game changer for at least one little family.
[...] Careers With An English Degree: How Reading Books Can Paralyze You After Grad School 32 comment(s) [...]
I needed to thank you for this wonderful read!
! I certainly loved every bit of it. I have got you
saved as a favorite to check out new things you post…