Here is a true story of my transition as a graduate student in the humanities to a search for a job in the real world. This article will give prospective grad students an idea of what to expect if you decide to leave academia. It also will give encouragement to other failed academics.
I’m fucked.
It’s April. I’ve spent 7 years studying modern poetry. Now, I have to try to find a job in the real world outside of fellowships, conference papers, and the grinding fear of not having a paper published. Now, I have to find an employer impressed with scholarships and research interests, rather than real skills. It’s April. It’s the end of term. My last fellowship of $1,150 has been cashed and I have 10 days to find a job before my money runs out. I’m fucked.
* * * * *
“Isn’t April the cruelest month?” asks my American literature professor, obviously bored with his exams to mark as he has been sending dry jokes down the hallways of the English department for the last 20 minutes. The Renaissance scholar, a nervous young man fresh from Ontario, responds with something in Middle English from Chaucer. I don’t get that one, but still smile. Pompous at the bitter end.
I am sitting on the floor, reading some of Ezra Pound’s fascist radio speeches. The students have mostly left campus and now the halls are left to graduate students and a few straggling honor students. We all seem to be making excuses to hang around campus. I’ve come to ask for advice about sinking my academic career.
This is the last week of my last term as a Master’s student. I’ve just picked up my final fellowship cheque−$1,100 to my name before the university sends me out into the world with the distinction of having spent the majority of my youth earning not one, but two English degrees.
I feel guilty. Now I will pay for the years of aesthetic contemplation and isolation from the world. Nobody will hire me. My friends, family, and rivals will finally get the satisfaction of hearing about my last prestigious accomplishment. “Now, the years of theft and starvation.” A line from Cormac McCarthy’s Blood Meridian that has, for some reason, been looping in my head for several weeks.
The professors stop talking. They return to the solitude of their windows and screens and sit in their bright carpeted offices, lined with big important hardcover books. These are the tenured. The fortunate grad students at the other end of the tunnel, reaping their modest reward. They speak with big vocabularies, and make jokes you need a passing grade on a doctoral competencies to get. These are the ones who managed to turn the fantasy of living off the ability to read big books into a livable wage. I wish I was one of them.
In the younger professors, the ones faced still with that last most important hurdle of getting tenure, you can still feel some of that graduate student anxiety. But it will fade.
I wanted, still want, my own office with a view of the dark courtyard garden beneath the English department. My title. A few stupid jokes on the office door. A reputation for not ever trying very hard. Accomplished, yet unprofessional. As if it just happened to me one day. Magical me. The comfortable system slipping cheques into your mailbox at night. The mortgage paid. The giant living room filled with books, emptying out into the bright Victorian street. Being apart of the machine, the everlasting system, and floating above the crude reality of menial jobs, boring statistics and business plans, and the meritocracy of political and commercial ambition.
My American lit. professor walks past and leans into the office of the Renaissance scholar. He is tall, dark, and bookish−like an older Jonathan Goldstein from CBC’s Wiretap. They make plans to go hear Nancy Armstrong speak about Darwin and Victorian Culture. They don’t sound excited.
Nobody is ever excited about Victorian culture, except the throngs of young, smart pretty women that the discipline seems to swallow.
I sit in the hall and stare at the old pictures on the English Department hallway. Linguistic jokes. Obscure paintings. I wonder what their wives think. Another lecture tonight. Another visiting expert. Another theoretical break-through, another list of professional responsibilities created and sustained by the department. I wonder if it leads to tension−is there the same level of respect about their discipline and all the self-importance made to the rather regular development of knowledge? Or would she prefer him to just stay home and watch America’s Got Talent, rather driving 20 minutes to the university to hear about the paradoxes of Darwin. I’ve spent 6 years at this campus, and 5 of those in these hallways. I’ve never met one spouse.
My supervisor’s door opens, and I give a little knock. He smiles warmly and offers me a chair. I like him. My supervisor makes you want to be kinder, less aggressive about your work. He is a true thinker. He doesn’t care so much about publishing thick books on obscure authors or making what the stuffy professor down the hall terms “theoretical interventions” against everything he reads. He only means good for everyone in the world. I don’t hold anything against him, and think he deserves everything he has.
We start to talk. First about Wallace Stevens, then about ethical responsibility, and then, finally, the Ph.D. job market. His tone turns a little quiet. It’s a subject most professors don’t really talk about. They’d rather talk about your brilliance, your ability to discern nuance, your ability for the discipline. Everything else is supposed to fall into place. Or, as is often the case, you disappear one day from the hallways and are replaced by a new bright mind.
I can tell already that this visit won’t solve any of my uncertainty about continuing with a Ph.D. in the humanities. But when I tell him I am considering dropping out because of the lack of tenure-track jobs, he reveals himself to be a terrible career counselor. His advice is this:
–He will retire soon. So that is one job open soon.
–The good ones always get jobs.
–York University is a good, if not politically divided place to work.
–Modern man must live with contradiction.
Yes. And modern man must earn a pay-cheque.
Lesson: professors are qualified, wonderful individuals. But they don’t know much about much the current economic flow of the world except the job they got. It’s not their responsibility to plan your future. They went from high school to undergrad to graduate school to post-grad to a teaching job to tenure. They are the lucky ones. Don’t listen to them.
I leave his office, and walk down the stairs to the ATM. My last cheque deposited. Thirty days to transition from a trafficker of aesthetic theory to an employee someone will hire.
On the bus home, I open my laptop and look at my resume. My skills apparently are ethical theory (Levinas), radio technology and the fascist poetic babble of Ezra Pound, and Old English. This is a lie. The Old English. I only liked the sound of the professor’s voice, lulling the old rhymes. I take it off, replace it with German which, according to some strange humanities’ grad logic, a future employer might be able to put to use. Other than degrees, I have a long list of academic awards, some papers I’m working on, a few conference presentations, and my research assistantship.
I’m fucked.
Recommended:
The English Major’s Guide to the Difference Between Print and Online Writing
This 68 page downloadable ebook teaches you everything you need to know about adopting your writing skills to the online world and is ideal for academics, English majors, and in-house writers.
Whether you need to attract more readers to your company or nonprofit blog or want to reach an audience with a personal writing project, this book will quickly bring your writing skills to a professional knowledge of online essentials.






I came to your blog via a comment on Youtube and I wanted to say that you made the right decision and to be brave and strong! I wish you the best of luck and it’s hard now but something will work out. Because that’s how life is. Something happens in the end that we take and run with because, well, what’s the alternative?
Thanks Riv—I feel very lucky to have choosen to not finish grad school.
–James (the writer at selloutyoursoul.com)–not sure if that has been clear as I post replies to all the comments.
Hi Jenlic,
I entered grad school at 23. In Canada, to do a Ph.D. you do a Master’s degree first (2 years) and then transfer into a Ph.D. (5-6 years). So after my Master’s I was admitted to a Ph.D. at McGill, but was second guessing the decision and so deferred my entrance for a year. And then, after that year, I told them I wasn’t going to come. I’m 27 now.
The reason why I told you that long story was because the year that I took off to think about whether to accept the offer from McGill was important to my decision. It gave me distance from the lifestyle and culture of academia and so my decision was based on many factors.
But I suppose the biggest reason was this: I saw the Ph.D. as a way to improve my earning potential and to secure a good career. I might have been wrong to think this, but that was what attracted me to grad school. I wasn’t looking to become rich, but I wanted some level of stability with my investment of time and energy.
So the big reason why I left was because I felt that the university could no longer afford to keep me. They offered me a full-ride and funding, but it was unclear what would happen after I got my Ph.D. I saw it as too much of a risk. I knew that I could dedicate my energy to other things. It was about return on investment for me. Grad school started to seem ridiculous: work like crazy, live in poverty for your twenties, and all for the small chance you will get a 50,000 per year job.
I did have fun at grad school and it has made me smarter and a better writer. But I saw myself (and others in my class) as having talents that were being wasted if there really wasn’t jobs for us.
That was what made me throw in the towel—too much work and sacrifice–not enough reward.
Hope that helps and really wish the best for you.
–james at selloutyoursoul
James,
glad youre (a tad) older than I am! I have kind of the opposite story. I am in a 1-yr masters here which I am doing as part of my bucket list (no intention of doing a phd after for all said reasons). I finished my JD last summer but have yet to pass the bar (it makes me cringe at how I have months out of my life to take out and study for this, and then months just to hear back, so doing the full ride of phd is just that much less appealing). But I got up everyday in law school sad that I had left what I love, and missing feeling talented (I really got kicked around in law school, though finished).
If you aren’t already on, I recommend joining Versatile Phd. It is a public board for people leaving academia and how they are transitioning. It is run by a former tt-history prof named Lexi Lord who weighs in very seriously on individual concerns.
[...] may want to start at the beginning by reading “April: The Beginning of the End of My Academic Career.” Please consider subscribing by [...]
Hi Jen,
Thanks for your encouragement and I can personally say that when I first left the thought of not having a Ph.D. was unthinkable to me (I was going to be called professor!) and now, the more distance that I get from academia, I see that it doesn’t matter so much. I’m happy now, even without the prestigious title.
All the best to you,
James @ selloutyoursoul.com
I got a PhD in English from McGill a few years ago and just wanted to congratulate you on your bravery to decide not to go. Based on funding and various measures of success, I was the dept star when I was there (or so I heard anyway), and I was lucky enough to get a tenure-track job at a liberal arts college followed by a better TT job at a research school after that (both in the US), but I still have regrets about having taken this path and think about quitting academia to return home to Canada. Add forced exile to the list of soul-crushing consequences of the academic job market because ACCUTE statistics show that over 50% of English jobs in Canada go to US or UK PhDs, so it’s even more unlikely that a McGill PhD would get you a job in Canada. I loved my time at McGill, most of the professors were great, and I like the dept (though there were/are serious problems too), but, as you rightly note, the dept’s placement history is not nearly as rosy as they try to spin it once you factor out postdocs, sessional positions, and CEGEP positions. Many McGill MA’s are teaching CEGEP without having slogged through the PhD program, and in fact there are more MA’s with those teaching jobs than PhD’s. If I’d known what I know now back when I began the program, I’d like to think that I’d have had your courage not to go in the first place, but it’s an incredibly tough decision and it’s so easy to get sucked into academia that it really does take a lot of inner strength to make the choice you’ve made, which I admire. The chances of getting a tenure-track job with a McGill PhD are slim at best, and while there are a lot of perks to the professor lifestyle (especially conference travel) there’s still no guarantee that you’ll actually be happy in the job or location where you’d end up even if you were one of the lucky ones to beat the odds. I sincerely wish you the best in your job search in the real world and look forward to reading your future blog posts.
Hi McGill PhD,
I’m glad, though, that you did end up getting a job…and you are right it is a tough decision, especially as you never really know if it would have turned out in the end. It was especially hard to give up the nice grad scholarship and a chance to study under some good professors–the professors were all very supportive and generous and painted a nice picture of what would have been a few nice years on the campus, reading and learning and writing. But despite the perks, it wasn’t for me.
Thanks so much for reading.
James from Selloutyoursoul.com
This is re-hashing an old comment, but there was something you said that I think is important to consider. Nov 13th 2010, you said:
I saw the Ph.D. as a way to improve my earning potential and to secure a good career. I might have been wrong to think this, but that was what attracted me to grad school. I wasn’t looking to become rich, but I wanted some level of stability with my investment of time and energy.
I want to make the point that, if your motivations stem from the desire for “security” or “income potential,” then perhaps academe is not right for you. Others are motivated by their desire to control their own destiny or their genuine passion for the minutiae they study. I think these are the type that choose to do a PhD program…not because of some economic calculus, but because they literally have no other choice than to be obsessed with their research interests.
I should have said “others are motivated by their desire to control their own work”
Hi Motivations,
I take your point– anybody who goes into academia to get rich is confused. But personally I think that most students expect, at least, to live a comfortable life within academia.
I don’t agree with this though: ” they literally have no other choice than to be obsessed with their research interests.”
I think that is a dangerous thing to encourage in an early twenties student. There are a few geniuses that might have “no choice than to be obsessed with their research interests” but these are really freaks of nature and are extremely rare (Hegel, Nietzsche). 99% of people in academia are not geniuses–just smart, motivated people that could find success and happiness in other fields.
I was a top student, a passionate researcher, and would have been an excellent professor and taken my job, writing, and role seriously. That “genuine passion for the minutiae they study” can be transferred to other fields.
That’s my experience, at least.
James from Selloutyoursoul
I am a young, incoming MA/PhD student, so admittedly I am biased. I have had many jobs though, from landscaping and factory work to serving and delivery driver to office intern to professional researcher (not in my area of interest). I will say that it is certainly possible to do other work, but it is soul crushing and gradually sucks your desire to pursue knowledge in your down time as all your energy is focused on forcing yourself to do something you don’t want to do for eight hours. Eight hours a day of your life is a chore. When engrossed in your study, however, 10, 12, or 14 hours can pass and you will not have noticed.
That is my experience at least, and why I will continue down my path regardless of the statistics.
[...] know that I have multiple English degrees. And you know what? They don’t care. And the further I drift away from academia, the less I care [...]
I just read this post. It basically describes me, in all but a few minor details. I’m just finishing up a PhD (UK) in, wait for it…. Medieval Indian Formal Logic! (fortunately I have a sardonic sense of humour). In the last few months I’ve come to realise just how much being in academia has messed me up (it’s on par with an addiction, if you ask me). N.B – perhaps an Academics Anonymous (ACANON) self-help group online? One of the clinchers was seeing my contemporaries go on to get lives (you know, partners, secure jobs, “real-world” stuff). As an academic you tend to associate with smart people who are going to do well, which makes the comparisons all the sharper when it all comes tumbling down.
Since having this realisation, I’ve tried to involve myself as much with the world as possible and to develop those “interpersonal” skills I’ve heard so much about (surprisingly, sitting in a dingy manuscript library in Oxford looking at Sanskrit manuscripts didn’t afford such opportunities). Volunteering is good fun – there’s plenty of really good roles out there which look good on the CV. I think I now actually need to reintegrate myself into the real world.
Happily my MPhil and PhD were all paid for by the government (so no debt – big relief), and I’m only 26. At the moment I’m just trying to think of it as a “career change”: plenty of “sensible” people I know have had to retrain in something else later in life either because of bad luck or an outright change of heart. And yes, on the one hand I’m preposterously overqualified, but then again I haven’t spent the last five years with my thumb up my ass doing nothing, like many people I know. My plan is to now beg, borrow and steal my way into law, and hopefully get all of those run-of-the-mill things that seem to come so easily to others.
To be honest, although I feel absolutely crushed now, I hope that in twenty years time I’ll look back with pride on this time, and be grateful that I had the opportunity for intellectual self-fulfillment that is denied to the vast majority of human beings (that is, if I’m not sitting in some noisy call-centre, grinding my teeth and wondering where the hell it went wrong….)
I’d be really interested to read anymore posts, if you’re carrying on with this…
Hey Mike,
Thanks for reading. I think that doing a PhD in England is a little smarter as it is faster. It’s pretty hard to finish a PhD by the age 26 in North America–most are around age of 30. I agree with everything in your comment.
I am now working full-time as a writer in an ad agency, as well as doing search engine marketing. So I don’t have as much time to spend on this blog and I’ve basically said most of what I have to say. I do intend to post roughly 2 posts per month, dedicated more to productivity, life after grad school, and other things that I’ve found to help me.
But if you just got your degree, I think you might be interested in these two posts of mine–all about learning how to sell your PhD to nonacademic employers:
Selloutyoursoul.com’s Ultimate Guide to Finding a Career as an English Major
And: “PhD in English: What the F*(#k have you been doing for the past ten years?”
Seriously, all the best–and I think you enjoy your career change.
James from selloutyoursoul.com
hahaha! “ACANON”. Too true.
[...] terrible time of your life again. You’ve graduated (again). Rent is due. You need a job. After years of aesthetic bliss in the halls of the English department, you now wander the streets, a 700,000, 000 page book [...]
[...] was April. My last month at graduate school. I was walking through the bright library searching for books to [...]
I came across a great quote last year that made me feel better about a similar academic dilemma: “When you’re standing on the edge of a cliff, progress can be defined as taking one step backwards!”
Good on you for having the courage to make the decision you did. The fear of feeling like a failure can often make us persist in something we should have let go of a long time ago. It is good to see that things are now working out for you. Thanks for your blog.
[...] most fictional realities, this story came to an unwanted end. I left grad school and was forced to rethink my economic strategy of hooking in my feet into some [...]
I really enjoyed this post and I thank you for sharing your experience. I am currently a grad student in Humanities and look forward to the day I’ll have the guts to do what you did. Grad school for me may be easy money and an easy life overall (compared to the people in life who have to actually work,) but it definitely is disappointing. When you fill out your grad school application it’s usually because you think grad school is all about intellectually stimulating, rigorous studies of the great works; in reality grad school has simply turned into a place for late twenties to early thirties year old people to loiter around in an unserious manner while putting off their eventual inability to get hired anywhere. If you really care about learning about Wallace Stevens or Michel Foucault, for example, go ahead and do it at home on your own time; cuz you probably won’t do it here. In fact, these grad schools are precisely NOT attracting or recruiting the really serious and passionate intellectuals anymore (I suppose if you are really smart you are smart enough to know better than going to grad school.) Instead, I’d argue the grad students are even less interested in the content itself than the typical undergrads are but are there just to collect a small paycheck for a few more years before having to face the real world.
[...] April. You know, the cruellest month for English majors. Time to leave the archive, graduate, and move [...]